2021.AI
GRACE AI platform whose governance module registers AI systems, runs risk assessments, maps controls to the EU AI Act and ISO 42001, and monitors compliance.
Jurisdictions · European Union · reviewed 2026-09-21
The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) applies to providers and deployers of AI systems in the EU, and to providers and deployers elsewhere when their systems or outputs are used in the EU. It works by risk: a short list of prohibited practices, heavy duties for high-risk systems, transparency duties for AI that talks to people or generates content, and an AI-literacy duty for everyone who provides or deploys AI.
The Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force since 27 July 2026) deferred the high-risk obligations to 2 December 2027 and 2 August 2028 and softened the literacy duty. It did not defer Article 50, which has applied since 2 August 2026.
Next date: Machine-readable marking of generative AI output, 2 Dec 2026 (in 71 days, upcoming).
| Date | Obligation | Status | Who | What and evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 February 2025 597 days ago | AI literacy duty, Article 4 EU · EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689) | In force | Providers and deployers of AI systems | Take measures, to your best extent, so that staff and others operating AI on your behalf have sufficient AI literacy. The Digital Omnibus (July 2026) clarified that no specific level must be guaranteed. The duty itself was kept. Evidence: Training register, training programme, validation of learning outcomes, written AI usage rules. Source: EU AI Act explorer, Article 4 |
| 2 August 2025 416 days ago | General-purpose AI model obligations EU · EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689) | In force | Providers of general-purpose AI models only | Technical documentation, copyright policy and a training-data summary for model providers, with extra duties for models with systemic risk. Companies that only use AI tools are not in scope. Evidence: Not applicable to deployers. |
| 2 August 2026 51 days ago | Transparency obligations, Article 50 EU · EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689) | In force | Providers of AI that talks to people or generates content; deployers of emotion recognition, biometric categorisation, deepfakes and AI-written public-interest text | Chatbots must disclose they are AI unless obvious. Generated audio, image, video and text must be marked as artificial in a machine-readable way. Deepfakes and AI-generated public-interest text must be disclosed. Disclosure must be clear and given at the latest at first interaction. Not deferred by the Omnibus. Evidence: Disclosure texts in place, marking mechanism documented, transparency checklist completed per system. Source: EU AI Act explorer, Article 50 |
| 2 December 2026 in 71 days | Machine-readable marking of generative AI output EU · EU AI Act as amended by Reg. 2026/1744 | Upcoming | Providers of generative AI systems and, in practice, companies publishing generated content | New obligation introduced by the Digital Omnibus: generated output must carry machine-readable marking. The same package bans generating non-consensual intimate imagery and child sexual abuse material, with penalties up to €35M or 7% of global turnover. Evidence: Marking mechanism in place for every generative system in the inventory. |
| 2 December 2027 in 436 days | High-risk obligations for stand-alone systems (Annex III) EU · EU AI Act as amended by Reg. 2026/1744 | Deferred | Providers and deployers of high-risk AI in employment, education, credit, essential services, law enforcement, migration and justice | Risk management, data governance, technical documentation, logging, human oversight, conformity assessment and registration. Deferred from 2 August 2026 by the Digital Omnibus. Evidence: Risk classification record, impact assessment, vendor documentation, oversight design. Source: Gibson Dunn, Omnibus agreement |
| 2 August 2028 in 680 days | High-risk obligations for AI in regulated products (Annex I) EU · EU AI Act as amended by Reg. 2026/1744 | Deferred | AI embedded in products under EU product law (machinery, medical devices, vehicles and similar) | Deferred from 2 August 2027 by the Digital Omnibus. Evidence: Product conformity files updated for AI components. Source: Gibson Dunn, Omnibus agreement |
AI inventory (AI register) · AI literacy · AI system · Annex I (AI in regulated products) · Article 50 (transparency obligations) · Biometric categorisation system · Deep fake · Deployer · Digital Omnibus on AI · Distributor · Emotion recognition system · Fine tiers and the SME rule · General-purpose AI model · High-risk AI system (Annex III) · Impact assessment · Importer · ISO/IEC 42001 · Machine-readable marking · NIS2 · Prohibited practices · Provider · Serious incident · Statement of Applicability · Substantial modification
24 verified listings from the directory, each checked against the company's own website. Listing is free; paid placements are labelled.
GRACE AI platform whose governance module registers AI systems, runs risk assessments, maps controls to the EU AI Act and ISO 42001, and monitors compliance.
Zagreb provider of ISO documentation toolkits, online courses and compliance software, including ISO 42001 toolkits, courses and employee training academies.
EU AI Act compliance software that classifies AI system risk and generates Annex IV technical documentation and Article 26 deployer registers.
Dutch nonprofit conducting algorithm audits and bias analyses, supporting AI Act and GDPR implementation, and publishing open-source bias detection tools.
Munich AI initiative offering AI strategy consulting, implementation, enablement programs and EU AI Act compliance support, including an accelerator for SMEs.
Polish training and HR company delivering KFS-subsidised courses in AI and automation, digital skills and management for companies with 10 to 5,000+ employees.
SMB compliance tool for GDPR and NIS2 with an AI system register for documenting AI tools, risk classification and measures under the EU AI Act.
Amsterdam legal and compliance consultancy providing AI compliance and governance, privacy, DPO-as-a-service, risk assessments and training.
Modular KI-Governance software for EU AI Act compliance covering AI system inventory, risk classification, fundamental rights assessment, documentation and model monitoring.
Wrocław law firm selling a ready-to-implement internal AI policy template aligned with RODO/GDPR and the AI Act, delivered as a PDF.
Barcelona firm providing FUNDAE-subsidised AI training including EU AI Act literacy, plus cybersecurity consulting and enterprise AI agents.
Belgian consultancy offering AI governance advisory and implementation alongside Flutter application development and software architecture services.