Classified examples · Building AI products · Po polsku
We fine-tune an open-weight model for our product
Depends on the useProvider
Engineers fine-tune an open-weight model (for example Llama or Mistral) on company data and ship it inside a product.
How we classify it
- The company is the provider of the AI system it ships.
- It becomes the provider of a general-purpose AI model only if the modification significantly changes the model; the Commission's indicative criterion is training compute for the modification above one third of the original model's training compute. Typical fine-tuning stays far below that.
- The risk class depends on what the product does: customer support is minimal or transparency; recruitment, credit or education uses are high-risk.
- Result: provider of the AI system in every case; general-purpose model obligations only above the compute criterion.
What applies now
- Record the compute used for fine-tuning and the base model's documentation
- Classify the product use with the risk procedure
- Article 50 disclosure and marking if the product talks to people or generates content
- Check the model licence and training data rights
What would change the answer
- Large-scale continued pre-training can cross the one-third criterion and bring general-purpose model obligations (documentation, copyright policy, training data summary)
Evidence to keep
- Compute record
- Classification record
- Model licence review
In the AI Compliance Kit: 03AI System Inventory · 04Risk Classification Procedure · 07Vendor Due Diligence Questionnaire.
Dates and sources
- General-purpose AI model obligations: 2 August 2025
- Transparency obligations, Article 50: 2 August 2026
Legal basis: AI Act art. 3(3), 3(63); Commission guidelines on general-purpose AI models (18 July 2025).
Similar examples
- We build a customer chatbot on a model API Transparency (Article 50)